“Abortion is advocated only by persons who have themselves been born.” — Ronald Reagan
If you liked the outcome of the Casey Anthony trial you’ll love this latest gambit from our neighbors to the north.
In citing Canada’s abortion laws, an Edmonton appeal court ruled that an Alberta woman who strangled her son with her underwear after secretly giving birth in 2005, will face no guaranteed jail time.
Katrina Effert was sentenced Friday for killing her newborn and then throwing the body over a fence into the neighbor’s yard on April 13, 2005, when she was 19. She was given a three-year suspended sentence by Judge Joanne Veit wherein if she abides by the court’s conditions for the next three years, she will not spend time behind bars. CBC notes the justification given by the judge for such an astounding sentence:
“The fact that Canada has no abortion laws reflects that ‘while many Canadians undoubtedly view abortion as a less than ideal solution to unprotected sex and unwanted pregnancy, they generally understand, accept and sympathize with the onerous demands pregnancy and childbirth exact from mothers, especially mothers without support,’ she writes.
The judge noted that infanticide laws and sentencing guidelines were not altered when the government made many changes to the Criminal Code in 2005, which she says shows that Canadians view the law as a ‘fair compromise of all the interests involved.’
‘Naturally, Canadians are grieved by an infant’s death, especially at the hands of the infant’s mother, but Canadians also grieve for the mother.”
The CBC report states:
“The Wetaskiwin, Alberta woman convicted of infanticide for killing her newborn son, was given a three-year suspended sentence Friday by an Edmonton Court of Queen's Bench judge.
Katrina Effert was 19 on April 13, 2005, when she secretly gave birth in her parents' home, strangled the baby boy with her underwear and threw the body over a fence into a neighbor’s yard.
She silently wept as Justice Joanne Veit outlined the reasons for the suspended sentence. Effert will have to abide by conditions for the next three years but she won't spend time behind bars for strangling her newborn son.
In her judgment, the judge rejected arguments from the Crown that the single father and the grandparent also face "the same stresses of the mind" as a mother who kills her own baby.”
“In a subsequent report by the CBC Katrina Effert cried in an Edmonton courtroom during her sentencing hearing Thursday as she apologized for killing newborn son more than six years ago:
“I'm sorry for everything that's happened," she said while fighting back tears. "Especially to my family. I put them through so much."
Two years ago, for the second time, a jury found her guilty of murder, but last May the province's highest court decided the jury made a mistake.
In a rare move, the Alberta Court of Appeal overturned the conviction, replacing it with the lesser one of infanticide.
The appeal court said Effert should have been given the benefit of the doubt based on psychiatric evidence.
At the sentencing hearing Thursday Crown prosecutor John Laluk recommended a four-year sentence saying, "We have to remember this is a homicide."
The maximum sentence for infanticide is five years in prison.
Royal said he was "completely taken aback by the crown's position," and asked for a suspended sentence of two to three years to be served in the community.
"What this woman needs is support and understanding," he said. "She doesn't need to be trucked off to the penitentiary".
"This is a very fine young woman who went through a tragic event.
"She seeks understanding from the court, which I suspect will be forthcoming."
Justice Joanne Veit reserved her decision until Friday afternoon.
The Crown is still waiting to hear if the Supreme Court of Canada will hear its appeal of the Alberta Court of Appeal's ruling.”
This is one of the most egregious miscarriages of justice I have ever heard of. I woman murders a living child like a farm yard chicken and throws the body over a fence into a neighbor’s yard and a judge reverses a jury decision convicting her infanticide, a crime that carries a mere five year sentence.
How our progressive dominated society has come to disregard the life of a new-born baby. If we feel it to be an inconvenience it is acceptable to dispose of it like some trash in the house.
O Canada, we stand on guard for thee — except for the innocent child.